{"id":7526,"date":"2024-03-28T13:00:05","date_gmt":"2024-03-28T17:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/employerdefensereport.com\/?p=7526"},"modified":"2026-03-20T11:55:58","modified_gmt":"2026-03-20T15:55:58","slug":"seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/","title":{"rendered":"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: revert;\">Last Friday, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit <\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/a21db1a9-ee86-4e05-b156-738012d7b87e.filesusr.com\/ugd\/460460_714cddb2658f46249091f4a491298a3c.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reversed a district court\u2019s decision<\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-size: revert;\"> upholding an arbitration award requiring an employer to pay more than $2.3 million in withdrawal liability payments to a multiemployer pension fund. The Seventh Circuit remanded the case to the district court with instructions to order the pension fund to repay the withdrawal liability it collected from Bulk Transport (\u201cBulk\u201d), a client of Conn Maciel Carey LLP.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/a21db1a9-ee86-4e05-b156-738012d7b87e.filesusr.com\/ugd\/460460_3096665644d8429288b28eb19f38fde7.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Screenshot 2024 03 27 150151 300x292\" class=\" wp-image-7528 alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png\" alt=\"Screenshot 2024 03 27 150151 300x292\" width=\"386\" height=\"376\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png 300w, https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151.png 673w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 386px) 100vw, 386px\" \/><\/a>The long-running dispute centered around a contract Bulk landed in 2004 to haul commodities, work known as the \u201cLISCO work.\u201d Commodities hauling had previously been covered by a collective bargaining agreement with Local 142, the Steel Mill Addendum. However, in 2003 the parties had agreed to exclude commodities hauling from the Steel Mill Addendum, which from that point covered \u201c<strong><u>Steel Mill Operation Work only<\/u><\/strong>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>When Bulk secured the LISCO work, it approached the union about negotiating a collective bargaining agreement to cover it, but Local 142 instead insisted that Bulk apply the Steel Mill Addendum to the LISCO work and threatened to strike if it did not. Although it objected that the Steel Mill Addendum did not cover such work, Bulk capitulated to the union\u2019s demand and made pension contributions for such work pursuant to the terms in the Steel Mill Addendum. Bulk eventually lost the LISCO work and almost seven years later, the pension fund demanded more than $2 million in withdrawal liability due to the decrease in contributions.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Bulk disputed the fund\u2019s assessment, but paid the amounts demanded and moved to arbitration with the pension fund. Eventually, the arbitrator found that although the Steel Mill Addendum did not cover the LISCO work by its terms, Bulk had adopted the agreement by its conduct in making the payments. The district court agreed with the arbitrator\u2019s ruling and denied Bulk\u2019s request to vacate the arbitrator\u2019s ruling.<\/p>\n<p>Bulk appealed to the Seventh Circuit, where it continued to press its argument that the lack of a written agreement covering the LISCO work meant that its contributions could not be used as a basis for withdrawal liability. Bulk asserted that 29 U.S.C. \u00a7 186(c)(5)(B) requires a written agreement to specify \u201cthe detailed basis on which such [pension contributions] are to be made,\u201d and that because the Steel Mill Addendum specifically and explicitly excluded all work other than steel mill operation work, the LISCO work did not qualify. As it had before the arbitrator and district court, the pension fund again argued that Bulk had adopted the Steel Mill Addendum by its conduct.<\/p>\n<p>In <em>Bulk Transport Corp. v. Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund<\/em>, issued on March 22, 2024, the Seventh Circuit agreed with Bulk, stating that \u201cadoption by conduct does not change the substantive provisions\u201d of a written agreement, and that \u201cthe terms of pension contributions to multiemployer plans cannot be changed orally.\u201d Instead, \u201c[t]he precise terms must be in writing \u2013 and, having been reduced to writing, must be enforced without any consideration of equitable arguments.\u201d Indeed, because \u201cCongress made the writings conclusive\u201d through 29 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7186(c)(5)(B) and 29 U.S.C. \u00a7 1145, \u201cemployers and unions cannot opt out of those statutes orally or by their course of conduct.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As this left no basis for the fund\u2019s assessment of withdrawal liability, the Seventh Circuit remanded the case to the district court with instructions to order the pension fund to repay the amounts it had collected from Bulk.<\/p>\n<p>An employer faced with an assessment of withdrawal liability should ensure the assessment is based only on legitimate contributions required by the precise terms of a written agreement. If it is otherwise, the employer may have grounds to contest the withdrawal liability.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last Friday, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed a district court\u2019s decision upholding an arbitration award requiring an employer to pay more than $2.3 million in withdrawal liability&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[860,910],"class_list":["post-7526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-traditional-labor-relations","tag-collective-bargaining-multiemployer-pension-plans","tag-labor-union-activity"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments - Employer Defense Report<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments - Employer Defense Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Last Friday, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed a district court\u2019s decision upholding an arbitration award requiring an employer to pay more than $2.3 million in withdrawal liability&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Employer Defense Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-28T17:00:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-20T15:55:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"673\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"654\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mark Trapp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mark Trapp\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Mark Trapp\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/477ddeeafd65ceb6ccad0cea94c0e74d\"},\"headline\":\"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-28T17:00:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-20T15:55:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":628,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Collective Bargaining &amp; Multiemployer Pension Plans\",\"Labor &amp; Union Activity\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Traditional Labor Relations\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments - Employer Defense Report\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-28T17:00:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-20T15:55:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/477ddeeafd65ceb6ccad0cea94c0e74d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/\",\"name\":\"Employer Defense Report\",\"description\":\"Conn Maciel Carey LLP\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/477ddeeafd65ceb6ccad0cea94c0e74d\",\"name\":\"Mark Trapp\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/15e54dc2094857bf6ac3e7caef1b5e37af57cdeab105046711ef6629c79f257f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/15e54dc2094857bf6ac3e7caef1b5e37af57cdeab105046711ef6629c79f257f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/15e54dc2094857bf6ac3e7caef1b5e37af57cdeab105046711ef6629c79f257f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Mark Trapp\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.connmaciel.com\\\/employer-defense-report\\\/author\\\/trappm\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments - Employer Defense Report","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments - Employer Defense Report","og_description":"Last Friday, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed a district court\u2019s decision upholding an arbitration award requiring an employer to pay more than $2.3 million in withdrawal liability&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/","og_site_name":"Employer Defense Report","article_published_time":"2024-03-28T17:00:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-20T15:55:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":673,"height":654,"url":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Mark Trapp","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mark Trapp","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/"},"author":{"name":"Mark Trapp","@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/#\/schema\/person\/477ddeeafd65ceb6ccad0cea94c0e74d"},"headline":"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments","datePublished":"2024-03-28T17:00:05+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-20T15:55:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/"},"wordCount":628,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png","keywords":["Collective Bargaining &amp; Multiemployer Pension Plans","Labor &amp; Union Activity"],"articleSection":["Traditional Labor Relations"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/","url":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/","name":"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments - Employer Defense Report","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png","datePublished":"2024-03-28T17:00:05+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-20T15:55:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/#\/schema\/person\/477ddeeafd65ceb6ccad0cea94c0e74d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png","contentUrl":"http:\/\/employerdefensereport.connmaciel.stagingarea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/Screenshot-2024-03-27-150151-300x292.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/seventh-circuit-orders-return-of-withdrawal-liability-payments\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Game Changer for Pension Withdrawal Liability: Seventh Circuit Orders Return of Withdrawal Liability Payments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/","name":"Employer Defense Report","description":"Conn Maciel Carey LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/#\/schema\/person\/477ddeeafd65ceb6ccad0cea94c0e74d","name":"Mark Trapp","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/15e54dc2094857bf6ac3e7caef1b5e37af57cdeab105046711ef6629c79f257f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/15e54dc2094857bf6ac3e7caef1b5e37af57cdeab105046711ef6629c79f257f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/15e54dc2094857bf6ac3e7caef1b5e37af57cdeab105046711ef6629c79f257f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Mark Trapp"},"url":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/author\/trappm\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7526"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7526\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9947,"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7526\/revisions\/9947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.connmaciel.com\/employer-defense-report\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}